Some countries, to achieve an international sporting success, are building specialized facilities for only top athletes rather than allowing common people to use those facilities.

Practice this IELTS Writing Task 2 question on IELTSX. Some countries, to achieve an international sporting success, are building specialized facilities for only top athletes rather than allowing common people to use those facilities.

Specialized sports facilities for top athletes versus public access - IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

.Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Write at least 250 words.

A student's answer to this task, and the feedback on it

Written by an IELTSX user under exam conditions and published unedited and anonymously. Band 9 ยท 406 words.

International sporting success is often regarded as a source of national pride, prompting some countries to invest heavily in specialized sports facilities that are reserved exclusively for elite athletes. While this approach may help produce world-class competitors, I believe it is largely a negative development because it limits public access to sports and undermines long-term athletic development.

Supporters of this policy argue that top athletes require advanced training environments to compete successfully on the international stage. Modern sports demand highly sophisticated equipment, expert coaching, and facilities designed to meet international standards. By concentrating resources on a small number of talented individuals, governments can maximize their chances of winning medals in prestigious competitions such as the Olympics or world championships. These achievements can enhance a country's reputation, inspire national unity, and encourage young people to take an interest in sports.

However, prioritizing elite athletes at the expense of the general public creates several significant drawbacks. First, public sports facilities play a crucial role in promoting physical fitness and healthy lifestyles. If ordinary citizens are denied access to high-quality sporting venues, they may have fewer opportunities to exercise regularly. This can contribute to health problems such as obesity, heart disease, and other lifestyle-related illnesses, ultimately placing a greater burden on the healthcare system.

Furthermore, restricting facilities to top athletes may actually hinder future sporting success. Elite athletes do not emerge in isolation; they develop from a large pool of young participants. When sports facilities are accessible to everyone, more children and teenagers can discover and develop their talents. A broader participation base increases the likelihood of identifying exceptional athletes who may later represent their country at the highest level. In contrast, focusing solely on current elite performers risks neglecting the next generation of sporting talent.

Another concern is fairness. Public funds are often used to build and maintain these facilities. Therefore, it seems reasonable that taxpayers should also benefit from them. Excluding ordinary citizens from publicly financed venues can create a sense of inequality and resentment, particularly when many communities lack adequate recreational spaces.

In conclusion, although specialized facilities for elite athletes may contribute to short-term international sporting achievements, the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. Governments should aim to strike a balance by supporting top athletes while ensuring that high-quality sports facilities remain accessible to the wider population. Such an approach would promote public health, encourage greater participation in sports, and contribute to sustainable sporting success in the future.

Examiner feedback

This is an exceptional essay that meets the criteria for Band 9. It demonstrates a sophisticated command of language, logical organization, and a deeply insightful response to the prompt.

Task Response - 9

- Fully addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the rationale for elite facilities and the negative impacts on the public. - Presents a clear, well-developed position that is maintained consistently throughout the response. - Ideas are fully extended and supported with relevant examples regarding public health and long-term talent development.

Coherence & Cohesion - 9

- Information and ideas are organized logically with clear progression throughout the essay. - Cohesive devices such as 'However', 'Furthermore', and 'In contrast' are used appropriately to link ideas. - Each paragraph has a clear central topic that supports the overall argument.

Lexical Resource - 9

- Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings (e.g., 'lifestyle-related illnesses', 'sustainable sporting success'). - Demonstrates natural control of lexical features and sophisticated collocations. - There are no noticeable errors in spelling or word formation.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy - 9

- Uses a wide range of complex structures with full flexibility and accuracy. - The majority of sentences are error-free, demonstrating a high level of grammatical control. - Punctuation is used correctly throughout to enhance the flow of the text.

Related prompts

Start Practice