Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility.

Practice this IELTS Writing Task 2 question on IELTSX. Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but others think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility.

Government laws regarding nutritious food versus personal choice for public health - IELTS Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Discuss both views and give your opinion

Write at least 250 words.

A student's answer to this task, and the feedback on it

Written by an IELTSX user under exam conditions and published unedited and anonymously. Band 8 · 309 words.

In recent years, the debate over whether governments should legislate laws about nutritious food to improve public health has intensified. While some argue that government intervention is essential to protect citizens’ well-being, others believe that individuals should retain the freedom to make their own dietary choices. This essay will discuss both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is necessary.

On one hand, proponents of government regulation contend that laws regarding nutritious food are vital for safeguarding public health. Governments can impose restrictions on harmful ingredients such as trans fats, excessive sugar, and salt, which are major contributors to chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and heart conditions. For example, several countries have introduced sugar taxes on sugary drinks, which have successfully reduced consumption and encouraged manufacturers to reformulate products. Moreover, mandatory nutritional labeling laws empower consumers to make healthier choices by providing clear information. Such regulations are particularly important for vulnerable populations who may lack the education or resources to make informed decisions independently.

On the other hand, opponents argue that personal choice and responsibility should be prioritized over government mandates. They claim that individuals have the right to decide what they eat without interference from the state. Long-term health outcomes depend largely on lifestyle habits, and education rather than legislation should be the primary tool to encourage healthy eating. Excessive government control can be perceived as intrusive “nanny-state” policies, potentially leading to public resistance and reduced effectiveness. Furthermore, personal motivation and discipline play crucial roles in maintaining a nutritious diet, which laws alone cannot instill.

In conclusion, while government laws regarding nutritious food can significantly contribute to improving public health by setting standards and protecting vulnerable groups, personal responsibility remains fundamental. A combined strategy that includes both regulatory measures and public education is the most effective way to promote healthier lifestyles and ensure sustainable health benefits for society.

Examiner feedback

This is an exceptionally well-written essay that clearly meets the criteria for Band 8. It demonstrates a sophisticated command of language, logical organization, and a balanced argument that addresses all aspects of the prompt. The use of specific examples and precise vocabulary elevates the response above a standard Band 7.

Task Response - 8

- All parts of the task are sufficiently addressed, covering both the government's role and personal responsibility. - The position is clear and maintained throughout, concluding with a nuanced "balanced approach." - Ideas are well-supported with relevant examples, such as the mention of sugar taxes and nutritional labeling.

Coherence & Cohesion - 8

- Information and ideas are sequenced logically with a clear progression from the introduction to the conclusion. - Paragraphing is used skillfully, with each body paragraph focusing on a distinct side of the debate. - Cohesive devices such as "On one hand," "Moreover," and "Furthermore" are used effectively and naturally.

Lexical Resource - 8

- The vocabulary is wide-ranging and precise, featuring terms like "safeguarding," "chronic diseases," "reformulate," and "vulnerable populations." - Natural collocations and idiomatic expressions like "nanny-state policies" demonstrate an awareness of style and tone. - Spelling and word formation are consistently accurate throughout the essay.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy - 8

- A wide range of structures is used with high levels of accuracy, including complex subordinate clauses and modal verbs. - The majority of sentences are error-free, showing strong control over grammar and punctuation. - The use of the passive voice and conditional structures is appropriate for the academic context.

Related prompts

Start Practice